September 20, 2026 a thought for today, When money speaks the world keeps silent. Swedish Proverb
Photos in my life yesterday
There first challenge was “on my bed”. This is her bed too, actually, she is relaxing herself while she has the whole bed to herself.
fore ground with door behind it showed clearly that it was under the stairs.
Life today. The day stated out a bit rocky with some of the old age ailments raising their ugly heads. The usual sciatica type symptoms, now an additional possibility, kidney stone. That is enough complaining for today.
The sermon was a message to think about with an added type of Baptist-like bump on the pulpit to make a point. I prefer a bit quieter point but it works for some I guess. The congregation was about the normal number of members present. We are still hoping for the youngsters to come back so we can do Sunday School again. They have been unable to attend for the last month or so.
I had promised a friend who doesn’t get to church every week that I would call when there was a bit of information she would like to know. She doesn’t get our informative texts and emails. So I called her when I got home. I guess another member had already called.
When I got home I got back to my daily check list, no heavy stuff since it is Sunday. I wanted to add something on my mind to the start of a book I am doing. I am calling the book “Observations of an Octogenarian”, it seemed a perfect title when a friend of mine suggested it. Then I got back to finishing this letter and setting up and filing the photos for the day. Now I have some uploads to do then a virtual visit with two great grandsons before dinner time.
That will make it a full and pleasant day.
The word to ponder today is discussion. I know of no country in which there is so little independence of mind and real freedom of discussion as in America. Alexis de Tocqueville. The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress. Joseph Joubert. For we both alike know that into the discussion of human affairs the question of justice enters only where the pressure of necessity is equal, and that the powerful exact when they can, and the weak grant what they must. Thucydides. Whoever in discussion adduces authority uses not intellect but memory. Leonardo da Vinci. Avoid any specific discussion of public policy at public meetings. Quintus Tullius Cicero. We live in this world in order always to learn industriously and to enlighten each other by means of discussion and to strive vigorously to promote the progress of science and the fine arts. Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the Scriptures, but with experiments, and demonstrations. Galileo Galilei. Let us hold our discussion together in our own persons, making trial of the truth and of ourselves. Protagoras. Bigotry is the disease of ignorance, of morbid minds; enthusiasm of the free and buoyant. Education and free discussion are the antidotes of both. Thomas Jefferson. On the face of it, it must be a bad cause which will not bear discussion. Truth seeks light instead of shunning it. Horace Mann. Philosophical discussions habitually make men happy and joyful not frowning and sad. Michel de Montaigne.
Article summary. I make, capture and generate images but I don’t like to “manipulate”. I like the truth and to show what is not what could be. I may “clean up images”, take out wires and trash on the ground. So I wanted to see what the article was saying. The title is I create manipulated images and videos – but quality may not matter much. Christye Sisson, Professor of Photographic Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology. At theconversation.com. It started by saying how some groups are “worried” because of what can happen with “fake”videos that may distort the truth which manipulating an original can do. What she is talking about here is how in some current cases things like that are done to “twist public opinion”. She and her group have tested image manipulations to see just how that really affects things. She hopes it will help people “track” the truth. They have found that is has to do with how people can “confirm their belief” and the technology that is used. As the article moved on and more study was done, the author said she was surprised that many people seemed to believe what they were looking at when she, the author, could “easily identify as altered”. As she studied it a little further if the “fake” image “supports” what the people already believe they will accept it, fake or not. She asked her son if he thought people believed what they see on online. She said he said “You can’t trust anything on the internet”. She contemplated that “he has grown up digesting imagery at a pace unmatched in human history”. I felt bad that as she pointed out that as we grew up and saw the transition of film to digital the trust in what we are seeing tends to be questioned or “broken”. I’d like to mention here that I don’t believe it was “from film to digital” exclusively, film could be “manipulated” in the darkroom. In her son’s generation and beyond it seems the “trust” was never there in the firs place. Which goes to my opening point “I like the truth and to show what is not what could be”. It use to be “seeing is believing”. It doesn’t seem to be true anymore. She hopes that the future generations will believe it when there is “proof that it is real”. She suggest learn “where an image came from and in what context”. In my case I am “physically” describing my images.
I think I will have fried rice for dinner.
Photos in my life today
The next assignment is “apple”. This is from the archives I don’t have apples on hand today. There is one in the frig but it is half eaten.
Joy
want to shop? Visit: fineartamerica.com search for joy rector click on “view shop” and redbubble.com search for jarector (and take a look at flickr.com search for rectorjoyce)














































